I wrote the followng response to the comment on the article 150 Year Old Canada Experiencing Highest Levels of Immigration Ever , by Ricardo Duchesne on the website Council of European Canadians (I've also posted the article here):
-------------------------------------
Jakob Scheffer • 20 hours ago
We should not use free-standing figures, but put them in perspective. In a link you gave, it is revealed that the total net cost of non-Western immigrants in Denmark is 33 billion kroner. That is 6.6 billion CAD, or about 1,200 CAD per capita. Better is to see what this 33 billion kroner is as a percentage of Danish GDP expressed in kroner. Denmark's GDP is about 2 trillion kroner, so those 33 billion kroner are 1.65% of Danish GDP. That is not a very high percentage.
A Swedish economist said it best when he stated that immigration has not brought any net economic benefits to Sweden, but that it hasn't been an economic calamity either. The problem of course is that it will become a calamity if it continues undiminished.
Regards. JS
-------------------------------------
Kidist Paulos Asrat Jakob Scheffer • 16 minutes ago
It is people like you who make wonderful pro and con pronouncements sitting from, no doubt, a comfortable perch, who haven't the God-given human (and humane) common sense to extrapolate on the consequences. These immigrants are not stupid. They know they cannot kill the goose which lays the golden eggs. Instead they cleverly cull and accumulate what they would need when THEIR time comes.
Of course they can do this because the structures are sound and solid and whites still continue to make the big and important societal (science, art, technology, medicine, community, etc. etc.) contributions.
But go to certain locations, both in the US and in Canada, and you will see what happens, and much sooner than you think.
Immigration has been sugar-coated by elitist intellectual language for so long now that these elitist intellectuals actually BELIEVE what they say.
Have some grit and take a stand. I challenge you.
Kidist Paulos Asrat
-------------------------------------
MoxNix Kidist Paulos Asrat • 8 hours ago
"They know they cannot kill the goose which lays the golden eggs."
Could've fooled me.
-------------------------------------
Kidist Paulos Asrat MoxNix • 5 hours ago
LOL. I meant to say that the intelligent ones know that. But eventually they have to destroy (are destroying) in order to set up their worlds.
By the way, Steve Paikin of The Agenda has a fascinating program this evening on diversity and multiculturalism. It will be on his website by the end of the day. Please watch.
The language of multiculturalism has entered fully into our language. It is astonishing.
Showing posts with label Country. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Country. Show all posts
Thursday, June 29, 2017
150 Year Old Canada Experiencing Highest Levels of Immigration Ever
by Ricardo Duchesne
The dishonest Canadian establishment wants us to believe that the incredibly high levels of immigration we have been experiencing since the early 1990s, ranging from 225-000 to 320,000 immigrants per year, are not historically unprecedented but part of a normal pattern in our "nation of immigrants." Century Initiative says:
Historically, Canada has successfully supported very high levels of immigration. In 1913, 400,000 immigrants arrived in Canada, representing over 5.2% of the population at the time.On the surface this may seem like an honest statistic. Stats Canada is even more emphatic that "record numbers of immigrants were admitted in the early 1900s...The highest number ever recorded was in 1913, when more than 400,000 immigrants arrived."
Ethnic Composition of Immigrants Today Is Fundamentally Different
Over the 400 years before Confederation, there were only "two quite limited periods" of substantial arrivals of immigrants: from 1783 to 1812, and from 1830 to 1850. In these two periods, the immigrants were "overwhelmingly of British origin." [...] Between 1896 and 1914, Canada experienced high immigration levels with more than 3 million arriving within this period. However, the ethnic composition of the nation remained 84 percent of British and French origin, while the European component rose to 9 percent. Between 1900 and 1915, the high mark in "Asian immigration" before the 1960s, 50,000 immigrants of Japanese, East Indian and Chinese descent arrived, but this number comprised less than 2 percent of the total immigration flow. In contrast, in 1914, there were nearly 400,000 Germans in Canada, the largest ethnic group apart from the British (which includes the Irish and Scots) and French.Facing these facts, the personnel of Century Initiative, and the academic establishment which has an inherent incapacity for critical thinking, would likely reply that their point has nothing to do with race but with the numbers of immigrants, as well as how "successfully" Canada integrated these high numbers in the past.
But this is a simplistic reply. For it matters a lot that the Canada that accepted high numbers in the early 1900s was a Canada determined to maintain the Anglo-European character of the nation. Ninety percent of the immigrants who came to Canada before 1961 were from Britain. In stark contrast, the top three sources countries for immigration in the last 10 years have been China, India, and the Philippines.
It is rather lazy to extrapolate that our current majority non-Western immigrants are bound to be "successfully" integrated because the Anglo-European immigrants before 1961 were so integrated. There is abundant research showing that Europeans are more individualistic in their values, whereas non-Europeans are more collectivist. Due to complex historical reasons, Whites have a greater inclination to value the individuality and rights of each person, whereas Asians, and non-Whites generally, have a stronger inclination to think in terms of the interests of their ethnic in-group members.
Here are some links to studies corroborating the individualist values of Europeans versus the collectivist values of non-Europeans:
- Individualism vs. Collectivism in Different Cultures: A Cross-cultural Study
- Collectivist Value Orientations Among Four Ethnic Groups: Collectivism in the New Zealand Context(PDF)
- Understanding the Individualism—Collectivism Cleavage and its Effects: Lessons from Cultural Psychology (PDF)
- http://web.uri.edu/iaics/files/07-Catherine-Konsky-Mariko-Eguchi-Janet-Blue-Suraj-Kapoor.pdf (PDF)
- http://gsappweb.rutgers.edu/cstudents/readings/Summer/Summer/Kelly_Diversity/Coon%202001%20individualism%20and%20collectivism.pdf (PDF)
History is also showing that the ever more diversified nations of the West are now experiencing continuous terrorist attracts, massive welfare expenditures for immigrants, and systematic raping of White girls by members of collectivist cultures.
Historically Highest Number of Immigrants Since Early 1990s
In contrast, only for the singular years of 1907, 1908, and 1911 to 1914, that is a mere 4 years, did the number of immigrants to Canada stood above 200,000, whereas since the early 1990s, the number has remained at an average of approximately 235,000 new immigrants per year. We have everything reason to mistrust the "experts" who tell us with a smug attitude that Canada had higher levels in the early 1900s. Let them know that during the last 25 years or so we have been experiencing the highest levels of immigration.
The Century Initiative plan to bring 450,000 per year until the end of this century has no parallels whatsoever in the history of any nation since the origins of humans. It is a malicious act of deception, therefore, to justify current immigration levels by referring to the "historically" high levels of immigration of the early 1900s.
Immigration numbers today are fast destroying the ethnic and cultural identity of the founding peoples of Canada. The prediction is that by the end of this century White Canadians will constituted only 20 percent of the population inside a nation controlled by 80 percent non-Whites lusting to eliminate what they will happily identify as the "White trash" leftovers.
If you don't want your children to live in this impending dystopia, support CEC.
Research the anti-Canadian Century Initiative.
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
Identity
Blue Nile Falls
This is an email I sent to a correspondent:
My cousin...was here the other day with her children as well as her brother and his wife.Interestingly, the last part I said, "Ethiopia, and Ethiopians and specially the Amhara, is resilient," is almost a direct quote from what her father said to them as they started their journey across the desert, which she discusses in her interview with the CBC. I hadn't listened to this part of the interview until today.
It is interesting. She stopped her memoir as she entered Canada. I was right about her reticence to write about her Canadian "experience."
[...]
She told me she is [now] writing a "fiction.
[...]
She brought up "identity" as part of her concern in her book...
I told her that "identity" in Canada was always going to be an issue for her (and people like her, although didn't say that).
"Ethiopia is going through some kind of renaissance. Why don't you and your family figure out a way to return? To go 'back home?' You came here through the most difficult way possible (they crossed deserts and countries before reaching Djibouti and finally coming to Canada as "refugees.")
Don't worry about culture and language. Both, especially for Ethiopians who live the culture daily, are easy to regain. Your children (they don't speak Amharic but understand it) will easily pick it up.
A country is a big thing. Everyone needs one."
She (and her brother) were listening to me intently.
I am glad I attended the dinner. I was curious to see what she would do after her "memoir."
[...]
I also said that in general that people like my father, important people ("big people" in the Amharic literal translation) could set an example and make the exodus back home. My parents have bought two houses from the inheritance house (which they sold at a fantastic price to high-rise developers) in Addis Abeba. They go back now every few months. They have invited me again in November but I have declined the invitation.
They could set an example for all these destitute, culturally bereft Ethiopians by returning (to Ethiopia). A courageous exodus.
Ethiopia is undergoing a "renaissance," I told them at the dinner. "After famines, revolutions, communist governments, ethnic wars, it still stands. Ethiopia, and Ethiopians and specially the Amhara, is resilient. It has withstood incursions and invasions through the centuries. The Amhara are still Amhara. Ethiopia is still Ethiopia. You could be part of this renaissance."
My father was quiet but I could see that he was stunned. He didn't expect me to say these things openly, although he knows my views.
I didn't plan this either. It was as though I HAD to do this. And I'm glad I followed this direction.
My cousins left without rancor or ill-feelings. I have told the truth, and they know it.
She says about her father (my father's now deceased brother):
He grew up hearing about Ethiopians defeating a common enemy and keeping Ethiopia independent for centuries. Ethiopians were very proud people then and I'm sure they still are. So he has that in him. This desert wasn't going to defeat him. He's done it. His ancestors have done it before. And that kept us very strong, because he was 100 per cent sure we would make it.I am simply telling her to make that journey in reverse, so much easier now that they have so much more than those clothes on their backs when they crossed that desert.
Then they can be Ethiopians once again.