About.......Contact.......Society.....................
Showing posts with label Writers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writers. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

An Austerism (Amongst Many)


NGC 2266
From the National Optical Astronomy Observatory website
NGC 2266 is a relatively "old" star cluster comprising stars of around 1 billion years in age. Many of its members are quite evolved, having reached the red giant stage of their lives. Our own sun will become a red giant when it is around 10 billion years old.
As I searched for an image to go with "Austerism," google images kept coming up with Asterism. I think that is actually a fitting image, and one to surely spark another Austerian discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I am glad to be living through the apocalypse with you." [Source: The Thinking Houswife]
I emailed Laura with this message:
Isn't that another clever "Austerism," bitingly real, but which makes you laugh out loud? And so many said (at least on reading his blog) that Larry had no sense of humor!
I looked through the web to see if anyone else had used "Austerism" for Larry Auster (one other has used it for his cousin, the writer Paul Auster). The only one I could find was one (see quote below) who wasn't "glad to be living through the apocalypse" with Larry Auster or any of us Auster Acolytes, or vile sycophants, as he would refer to us, simply to irritate his non-sycophantic readers.

This comes from the blog "Diversity is Chaos," a name which would have received Larry Auster's scathing, and hilarious, approval ("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize," the writer at Diversity is Chaos heads his blog ):
Austerim

Dennis Mangan on Larry Auster:
But Auster is being, as usual, extremely picky about what he's willing to support. His stands remind me of the joke about Switzerland: everything not forbidden is mandatory. With Auster, everything that doesn't measure up to his exacting standards is to be condemned. He condemns neocons, paleocons, libertarians, liberals, atheists, game advocates - what's left? Only Austerism. Everything else reeks of gnosticism, nihilism, and evil. Or if it doesn't, it simply is not serious.
Interestingly, the original author of this post has deleted the post (having refused to be an Auster Sycophant, although he had qualified as one before jumping ship).

Another use (creative use) of "Austerism" is by this business writer who clearly indicates that he "invented" the word:
The greatest danger for Spain right now is the EU’s cult of fiscal discipline, let’s call it austerism.
The Lawrence Auster variation is much better.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat

Friday, November 1, 2013

What is Writing?


"What is Writing?

Half, maybe most, of writing is finding faults in one’s own writing, and fixing them, until one finds nothing more to fix. It is an immersion in one’s own flaws, and a constant, unyielding effort to ameliorate them."
Lawrence Auster: March 18, 2013
This is the same with all art. Artists will say that once an idea has emerged, one has to fix it until there is nothing more (humanely) possible to fix.

That is the joy, and agony, of art. It is a ruthless companion. It doesn't suffer laziness. Yet, that is how beauty is born.

I wrote to a correspondent about a critic of sorts of Larry's writing in response to his passing away. The writer wrote:
I'm damned if I'm going to wait to the end to note in "appreciation" Larry's deep and challenging, provocative and exacting, disturbing, irascible and trenchant commentary, all crafted in his compulsively writerly way to search not only for the truth, I would venture, but for a way out of the cultural abyss we find ourselves in. His means? The sharpest, starkest expression of the facts and phenomena he is able to convey, as unadulterated, as unjumbled, certainly as unvarnished as humanly possible. Whether in agreement or in opposition, a reader of Larry's work is on his mettle, keenly aware of the laser at work.
I write:
[The writer] makes [Larry] sound to be a difficult and slightly detached/unapproachable person. I wonder if she ever met him? Yes, Larry was not part of this era's "diplomatic" journalism. But why not write of his achievements, rather than pepper her comments with these criticisms, which diminish his achievements? I think Larry's writing has coherence and beauty, and a perseverance with ideas that few writers these days attempt, or bother with.

[The writer] writes interesting articles. But, there always seems to be a reticence about her. I suppose she has to be like that to keep her journalistic positions at various main stream publications.

She knows Larry, and his work. He has written very important works regarding conservatism. It would be nice if...she would be a supporter.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, September 16, 2013

Starting Out in the Evening



I meant to write this review, of a film and a book, a while ago. I found it in my "draft" files, and here is the finished piece.

Starting out in the Evening is a quiet, graceful film about Leonard Schiller, a New York writer who is working on what could be his final book, and Heather, a young, aggressive graduate student who disrupts his life to do research for her master's thesis on him. Leonard is initially taken in by this bold young woman, and reluctantly agrees to her regular visits to interview him. He admires her persistent and intelligent personality. But he refuses to answer personal questions, saying that explaining his books and the ideas behind them is sufficient.

Leonard's daughter, Ariel, meets Heather on one of her visits to her father, and jokingly asks Heather if she a burglar. This becomes an inadvertently astute observation. Heather ends up "stealing" part of Leonard's life by digging into a past that he never told her, and putting it in her doctoral dissertation without his permission. And Leonard trusted Heather enough to give her a key to his apartment, which she betrays by rummaging around in his study for information that she wouldn't (or couldn't) obtain from him. She found a box full of photographs in Leonard's study, and took (stole) a photograph of Leonard in his younger days.

Heather, in her inquisitive and prying manner, finds out a sad story of betrayal about Leonard and his wife, which Leonard omitted from telling her during the interviews. Heather includes this piece of information in her final thesis draft, concluding that Leonard's writing turned nihilistic, and less literary, after this betrayal. Leonard is unaware of this addition until Heather gives him the final draft to read.

Any affection Leonard may have had for Heather is erased after he reads her work. He shows this during what is to be Heather's visit to his apartment, when she came to see his reaction to her work. Leonard makes no small talk with Heather, and lets her sit at his kitchen table as he drinks his tea. He then moves his hand towards her face, as though to stroke it, and Heather moves slightly forward to receive his caress. Instead, Leonard flicks his wrist in a short and sharp manner, and slaps Heather hard on her cheek. Like a true narcissist, Heather doesn't have any remorse, or realization of any wrong doing. "I didn't deserve that," she says. Leonard sits back, and closes his eyes as though for a nap. Heather leaves the keys to the apartment on the kitchen table, and walks out.

This little scene is a turnaround for Leonard, who finally tackles his typewriter to work on the book which had eluded him for so long. "My characters haven't done anything interesting for over a decade," he says at one point in the film. The novel is titled: Starting Out in the Evening.

The last scene of the film is Leonard hunched over his typewriter. It is a still life shot of him, although a cinematic still life. The camera slowly pulls out of this motionless Leonard, from the confined and restrictive frame of just his face and hands, to gradually include his typewriter, his desk, a lit lamp, and the open curtains behind him. We realize that Leonard is now in his writing "sanctuary." Leonard then begins to type confidently. He is starting out again, late in the afternoon, late in his life. But he's starting out again.

Despite the story being set in New York City, it is a film about interiors: the interior of Leonard's apartment, the interior of his mind, the interior where writers and artists access their thoughts. And these interiors are silent sanctuaries.

The film is a quietly elegant, much like Leonard's personality.

There is a DVD of the film - a little hard to find, but available (here). It is worth buying and watching.

The book is surprisingly literary, and a pleasure to read. Here is how we are introduced to Leonard, at the very beginning of the book, when he meets Heather for the first time in a coffee shop:
The door opened and a man came in from the cold. He was wearing an enormous coat - a coat that was like a house - and a big, furry, many-flapped hat. He peeled off the hat and stepped for a moment in front of the cash register, stamping off the snow. He was wearing galoshes.

They had never met, but he picked her out instantly, and he came toward her, smiling.

[...]

"So," he said finally, "you've embarked on a project of questionable merit. You're working on a study. Of me." He shook his big head sadly.
The filmmakers stayed quite faithful to the book, but of course they had to leave out many small details, making a more impressionistic film, where expressions relay messages and images describe psychological states (like the camera making a slow zoom out of Leonard's room to show us his "liberation" from his past ghosts, and his resumption of his book). The book and the film complement each other very well.

Here is a surprisingly good review by the New York Times:
A crepuscular glow suffuses Andrew Wagner’s intelligent, careful adaptation of a near-perfect novel by Brian Morton. One of Mr. Wagner’s themes (and also Mr. Morton’s) is the waning of that old, literary New York, the twilight of an idea of the city as a capital of the modern mind. Leonard Schiller, one of the main characters, is a retired teacher and all-but-forgotten novelist. Leonard, as embodied by Frank Langella, is a picture of old-fashioned decorum and steadfast dignity. Watching Mr. Langella’s slow, gracious movement through “Starting Out in the Evening,” I was reminded of Burt Lancaster in Luchino Visconti’s adaptation of “The Leopard.” In some ways the comparison is absurd, but both movies concern an old man who has outlasted the social order in which his life made sense. And what is so remarkable about Mr. Langella is that he seems to hold Leonard’s intellectual cosmos inside him, to make it implicit in the man’s every gesture and pause. Instead of nostalgia, “Starting Out in the Evening” offers a clear-eyed elegy for that world. — A. O. Scott [The full review is here]

The review overestimates the talent of Lauren Ambrose, the actress who plays Heather. I thought Ambrose acted with a strained narcissism. Well, perhaps she does suit Heather.

And the review doesn't do service to the film's score. I thought the music was quiet and delicate. It is a film mostly about interiors, after all, and I think the composer, Adam Gorgoni, captured that mood very well.

Here is a good review of the film's music (which says the same thing I'm saying).

Below is a youtube of the music accompanying various scenes from the film.



Here is another link to various pieces from the film.


Dusk on the Upper West Side


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Book: Starting Out in the Evening, by Brian Morton

Film: Starting Out in the Evening, Directed by Andrew Wagner

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, May 27, 2013

Book Project: Writing


Bookshelf at Kennedy's in New York
[Photo by KPA]

I've been away from books. It used to be that I would have a couple of books on the works, usually one fiction and another cultural/art/biographical book. At school, I would find a quiet place to read a chapter, or half a chapter, before returning to school projects. My favorite place as a young girl was the seat of a tree-trunk. At work, I would use my lunch breaks, or coffee breaks, to read. At home, I would reduce the number of hours sitting in front of the television to resume a chapter I had to leave to return to other pressing matters.

In the past few years, it could be that I became disappointed with the selection of new books available these days, or that I had read enough of the classics that I wanted something modern and fresh. Yet almost all the modern books disappointed me, and I stopped buying books. I left off re-reading the classics. I started to spend more time on short on-line articles on the internet. And I started watching movies, and literary adaptations on television. I read fewer and fewer books.

Recently, I have gone back to books. I sit at a restaurant, or a coffee house, and bring my books, often two at a time, as I explained earlier my reading habits: Ernest Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises, C. S. Lewis' Mere Christianity, Brian Morton's Starting Out in the Evening (a contemporary book which nonetheless won me over with its writing), Edith Hamilton's Mythology, Candice Bushnell's One Fifth Avenue (a witty contemporary book whose writer is of Sex and City fame), Roger Scruton's Beauty, Ron Chernow's Washington, and Nancy Berner's and Susan Lowry's Garden Guide: New York City.

I bought all but one of these books within the last year, so there's hope yet, except for Hemingway's which is an old edition which I bought at my undergraduate university's used book store (the bookstore's stamp - Paper Back Junction - is still on it, as well as an inscription by a reader dated '71, who wasn't a fan of the book, but I do disagree!).

It looks like I went into a flurry of buying, and reading, to make up for lost time, these past couple of years.

People seem to have some respect for books, and book readers. At the coffee house or restaurant which I visit more frequently (just a drink at both, and occasionally a meal at the restaurant), the owners/waiters/managers don't seem to mind that I choose a seat in the back, and that I could be there for an hour or more with just a coffee refill, or a plate of french fries, reading a book or taking and making notes. They seem to think I bring prestige to their place, and are kind and serviceable towards me.

Well, I did tell them something else, partly to alert them toward my long sit-times. "I am in the process of writing a book." I told one manager. I told him I come there to refresh my ideas, sometimes by reading another book, and other times by going over the notes I've made.

Since then, he takes the back in the back himself to quiet area, if he's not busy. And waiters (who desire to be writers?), actually sit down to chat with me. One in particular is too polite to ask direct questions, so I fill him in on the latest, if I can, and if I want to.

I wondered about this attention.

I think people are interested in those who do things, or who say they do things. And since I am coming into their premises to do something creative, they seem to want to make that as easy as possible for me.

I am often touched and surprised by their attention.

But, there is something else. I think there is a great deal of prestige given to writers. A writer, whether a fiction writer, a biographer, a political/social/cultural writer, invents something new through the sheer determination of his mind. It is creativity at the cerebral level, using the imagination of the writer and the reader to bring the work to life.

It is perhaps like the Bible. We have our created world, yet, in order to make sense of it, to analyze it, to make it a reality, God then created the Word. But the Bible is not just simply a descriptive account of the world around us. Its words create a myriad of things, from a literary masterpiece, a daily guideline, a family saga, a message bearer, a sin-identifier. Without this ability of the written word to convey so much, our Bible would be just another artifact, a prolonged magazine article, convincing no-one it is worthy to spend years to decipher its alphabets and words in order to read it, understand it, and make sense of our world through it.

I think that is what books are trying to do. And in a modest way, that is what I am trying to do.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: Kidist P. Asrat
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------